Myth: Vaccinations prevent diseases

I cringed this morning when I read in my local newspaper, that the health authorities are advising the public to take seasonal flu vaccination. It never ceases to amaze me why the so-called "health" authorities are concerned about health but never stop to question the efficacy (or non-efficacy or even harm!) of what they are prescribing, sheesh ...

Why take flu vaccination? Do vaccinations really prevent any disease at all? There are tons of reports/evidence out there that have proven the dangers of vaccinations. One clear botched job was the polio vaccination ... people from my generation would have known at least a few people who were adversely affected by the polio vaccination.

FACT: Vaccinations carry a much higher risk of adverse effects than the risk of anyone actually dying of the diseases vaccinated against. Like any drugs (read man-made for profit), vaccines can cause from mild to severe side effects. When we didn't know better, we were told that vaccinations were necessary for our babies. We allowed it and built a poor health foundation for our little ones, who grew up with all kinds of diseases.

Not only are vaccines not effective in preventing diseases, they are counter-productive and even dangerous -- undermining the immune system, causing a host of unnecessary side effects that keep taking us back to the doctors for more drugs! Is that the kind of life we want?

Some of the known adverse effects of vaccines: low-grade encephalitis (inflammation of the brain), autism, learning disabilities, mild to severe brain damage, seizures, epilepsy, sleeping disorders, eating disorders, autoimmune diseases, crib death, asthma, diabetes, impulsive violence, etc. These symptoms may or may not appear immediately after vaccination, but may also resurface later in life as any kind of diseases, even cancer. Then we wonder why we become sick. These are silent killers that the uninformed never thought twice about accepting.

Seasonal flu shot? Watch this heart-wrenching video. A beautiful normal girl ended with a disease called Dystonia, 10 days after she got a seasonal flu shot. Sad.



Depending on the vaccination, the risks are higher especially to those who are already weak with their immune system, have certain nutrition deficiency and are vulnerable to the effects of the drugs injected into the body. Some vaccines even contain aluminum and mercury which we know are highly toxic to our internal system and cannot be eliminated through the normal channels. This means it stays IN our system and cause long-term damages.

Knowing that there are side effects with vaccinations, do we then still rather trade a (possibly harmless) disease that we now know how to handle, for the possible risks of severe and permanent damages? In fact, a doctor has admitted that the swine flu vaccine is even more deadly than the disease itself; and would not give it to his own kids. Would you inject toxic into your blood something that doesn't even guarantee you against the disease? Watch this video:



Viruses thrive in acidic blood. Just begin to eat healthily: lots of fruits and vegetables, take your vitamins, drink lots of water, reduce on your meat intake, cut out on processed foods, get sufficient sleep, exercise. Changing your dietary/lifestyle this way alone would help you go a long way in preventing H1N1 virus or any virus for that matter. A much better and safer alternative to getting vaccinated.

Also read: H1N1 - Does it bother you?

Still not convinced? Do a Google or Youtube search on the words: "Dangers of Vaccinations" and you will see endless reports on the adverse effects of vaccinations. Think again before you decide on taking a vaccination for yourself or for your loved ones. Are the risks worth it? SD.

About Doctors And Medicine

To See A Doctor Or Not To See?
My son is having a fever. And my wife insisted we take him to a doctor. Being a Sunday, his usual doctor was not opened. So, we went to a another one.

I have been to this doctor many, many years ago. (Ya, I hardly fall sick. And I don't like to go to a doctor for minor sickness.) Today, the doctor that attended to me was not in. We saw a different doctor.

When it was our turn, the doctor checked my 4 years old boy. He looked at the boy's nose and mouth. He is having cough, sore throat, flu and fever. The usual combination.

As the doctor looked at my son's nose, my wife said, "he has sinus." And the doctor said that sinus can be control by medication. The medication has to be taken daily and "he will be alright."

My inner bell went off, "What the heck? A four year-old... medication, daily?" This is absurd. Is the doctor a pharmaceutical company's salesman too?

The Doctor And The Car Salesman - Spot The Difference

This is how the industry works. For those who don't know. I will share this with you. My brother was once a pharmaceutical company's salesman. He visited doctors' clinics and offices. Talked to the doctors. Handed them some brochures about the (sometimes) new medicine. Explained to the doctors a little bit about the new drugs. How to prescribe them.

Sometimes these salesmen just do not have the time to talk to the doctors. Either they or the doctors are busy. They may have left the information to the receptionists or the nurses. You can suspect the information are not properly cascaded to the doctors.

Now, get this. The doctors listened to these salesmen about the drugs. The salesmen will tell them how their companies have researched on the new drugs. And sometimes there are side effects of the drugs which they may not revealed.

When the salesmen tell the doctors that this drug is for fever, the doctors believe it. Like the pharmaceutical companies have given mankind a miracle drug.

I have a friend who is a doctor. I asked him. How does he know the drugs are good or not? He just couldn't answer the question. You see, the drugs are tested and researched by the pharmaceutical companies. Not the doctors. The doctors know jack about the drugs except through the salesman's mouth. Or some medical literature that they read. Or some through conference they have attended.

The doctors just prescribed the drugs to the patients. More drugs, more sales for the clinics. More sales, more profits. More profits, happier shareholders. Happier pockets for whoever operate the clinics.

That is also why the doctor brought up the topic on medication for sinus. Trying to push more drugs and help the clinic to make more bucks.

Take this analogy. The car salesman (read doctor). He sells the car (read drugs). And you (read patient) walked into the showroom. The salesman will ask you a few questions and you tell him what kind of car you are looking for.

And the car salesman will tell a little bit about the performance of the car. Just like how the doctor has a little knowledge about the drugs, but not fully. And you are happy and take the car. Some months later, the cars get recalled by the manufacturer... duh?

Think I am exaggerating?

Look at the recent Tylenol drugs recall.

If you are not careful, you might even die from the doctor's medicine. While waiting for our turn, a patient told my wife and I she was given very strong drugs. It made her gums pain. She was there to see the doctor again to demand an explanation.

I think it is not the strong drugs. Rather it is THE drug that is wrong. Sheesh, should have just walked away from the clinic then.

So, what do the doctors really know?

I asked the same doctor friend. How does he keep himself updated with the latest development in the medical field? He said he gets the periodical medical journal. Yeah, but does he read? Do all the doctors diligently read them? They are humans too. They just want to go home and watch TV.

And even if they have read it, the journal may still be full of the orthodox methods. Orthodox method is when you treat only the symptom. How convenient, oh he has sinus, take this and that medicine. What about treating the root cause of why sinus happens? The doctors just don't ask more about a patient's dietary habit. What food to eat, what to avoid.

And talking about food. My wife continued, and asked the doctor. "Can he take soy milk? I heard milk is not good."

I have been telling and advising my wife to wean our child of milk. Whether it is cow's milk or soy milk. They come in a can. And they are processed in factory. Just look at the ingredients printed on the can. Full of chemical names that I don't even know how to pronounce.

My wife just don't believe what I have said. Probably because I don't have an M.D. at the end of my name. Or maybe because I don't charge people money for talking about health. She asked the doctor sort of like to debunk my theory that milk is bad. Still skeptical about what I said. Well, this is not the first time she asked a doctor in my presence. Every time my son is sick, I will tell her about stopping the milk.

Milk from these powder is sweet. And I know for a fact sugar and sweet things are not good.

See articles on milk.

And the doctor said, "Milk is good for everybody. No problem. Why is it not good?"

If everybody does the same thing, does it mean it is good? Many people smoke. Is it good?

I told the doctor. This thing comes in a can. They are processed food. I realized I was talking to doctor with a last century's mindset. And I told my wife, "It's ok, I don't want to talk to him anymore."

See? This is what I had asked just now. Do the doctors read diligently? The knowledge that milk is bad for us has been around for so long. And this doctor just don't read and research enough. Just trusting the pharmaceutical companies and the milk industry.

Living in this capitalist world, slaving away during the day... my son is left to the care of the babysitter and sometimes his maternal grandmother. They feed him cheese (a dairy product - another no-no) in cereal. They give him cookies (sweet stuff). They give him bread (that has milk content). They give him milk because they said "he cries for it." Hey, you are an adult. If you stop giving him, he won't be able to drink it. Let him cry his head off. He will look for better things to drink and eat. Not milk.

So I asked the doctor what made my son sick? Whether it was the heat (living in a hot climate country) and he was not properly hydrated? Well, the doctor conveniently laid the blame on the seasonal virus.

Come on! If it's the virus, then everyone around my son will already be sick! What crap.

A better explanation will be (and I was expecting from a doctor) - the body's immune system is not strong and easily overcome by virus. The body's immune system is not strong because of the crap food that he has been eating.

The doctor even advised my wife not to give my son any fruit when he is sick. Another bell went off. What the...? Food is a natural food. Created by nature. And what is better than that? Milk powder in a can? Medicine in a bottle?

I didn't even bother to ask him anymore for explanation on why he thought fruits should not be taken.

Stop Listening To These Car Salesmen In Doctors' Clothing

At that moment, my ears have completely shut off. I am not listening to anything anymore that came out of his mouth. And that's the reason why I have never trusted doctors' words. And why I don't like to see them. And why I don't want to go to them even when I am sick. I rather take care of it myself.

Healthy dietary habits start at home. You are what you eat. My son has been seeing doctors quite often for fever. I highly suspect it is the bad eating habit cultivated from the adults around him.

As we reached home, my son vomited some of the milk and cereal he took in the morning. If milk is good like the doctor said, why is the body rejecting it via vomit?

Eat healthy non-dairy products. No sweet stuffs. And you will stay away from these lousy doctors for life. Hope you feed your child with natural food - fruits, grains, beans and vege.

Now, let me go and talk to my wife again...

Have similar stories to tell? Leave your comments.

Myth: Cancer kills

How many times have you heard someone say: "I lost my loved one to cancer", or "She succumbed to cancer". From the doctor's mouth, the very word "cancer" often shatters the world of the person to whom it's pronounced; and fills the world of all his/her loved ones with a sense of hopelessness. The fear of the word is simply because we all have heard of people who "have died of cancer", of those who underwent treatment and who were never cured. The doctor's prognosis usually doesn't give any more hope ... three months, six months ... is there any will left to live?

I still hear of people wanting to find the "cure for cancer". Truth be told, the cure for cancer is already in YOUR hands. YOU have the ability to heal your body of cancer, simply because YOUR body is designed with the ability to heal by itself. The cure is NOT in chemotherapy, radiation, surgeries, drugs. NO! NO! NO!

Recently, a dear friend of mine lost his only sister to what I believe NOT to cancer, but to the amount and onslaught of a series of chemo-treatments, radiation, anesthetics, surgeries, painkillers, drugs, drugs and more drugs. Any healthy person undergoing these torment/poisonings would not have been able to survive. What more one who has cancer? And she was only at stage one! From the day she was diagnosed to the day she died, she underwent five major surgeries, removing organs in her body, subjected to a series of chemos, painkillers and bunches of drugs. All within the spate of just six months!! Tell me which healthy person would not die because of this treatment? Sad to say, under the hands and at the mercy of the doctors and surgeons who were supposed to preserve her life, she still had to die, leaving behind a huge medical debt to her already heart-broken loved ones. I believe without treatment she could have lived another five years or more, with careful change to dietary and lifestyle habits! Stage one of a common organic cancer isn't too difficult to heal with nutritional therapy.

Just what exactly is chemotherapy?

The chemo drug is so toxic that it could burn through a hole if you put it in your hands, and you allow the doctor to put that into your body!? Chemo drugs cause erosions and damages to a big chunk of your cells, burn your blood vessels, causing chaos to your internal system, undermine your immunity at a time when your body needs it the most for healing. No wonder the patient has internal bleeding, excruciating pains, organs failure, vomiting, loss of appetite, losing hair and no more will to live. She is suffering from severe burning in her insides and severe poisoning. Who could've survived this kind of condition? Tell me who could? I know I couldn't have!

An oncologist knows that chemo-treatments have very low (or nil) recovery rate, so why does he still recommend chemo? Because an average cancer patient undergoing chemotherapy is worth a huge amount of money! It is far too lucrative NOT to offer chemo. If the doctor himself has cancer, I believe he would not want to go through chemo-treatment for himself. There's obviously something that the doctors know that the common public doesn't. Do you see the picture? It is a very sad picture indeed.

I cringe everytime I hear of anyone opting for chemotherapy. And I get very angry with the medical industry for prematurely killing precious lives. How many more lives do we have to sacrifice before we realize the danger of chemotherapy? The danger of drugs! It's not that I don't speak up. People trust the medical industry more than they would, to something so healing and so simple and so cheap ... like nutrition from herbs, fresh fruits and vegetables and all the healing foods God has given to mankind for health (Genesis 2:9a).

The "success" of most clinical studies on cancer is measured by the shrinking tumor, NOT the mortality rate. If a cancer patient DIED but had their tumors shrunk due to chemotherapy, the study would be considered a "great success" and a medical breakthrough!! With a failure rate of 93%, I would never consider medical cancer therapy a "success", considering also the non-existence of "quality life" in the course of treatment. It is literally a vicious killer!! When the doctor tells you that chemo is "effective" in shrinking the tumor, he would also omit to tell you that "effective" only means shrinking the tumor but DOESN'T cure cancer NOR extend life. But why kill everything else inside you just to shrink the tumor? The tumor may not even endanger your health unless it's obstructing vital passages.

My friend, cancer didn't kill your loved ones, the medical treatments did ... chemotherapy/radiation therapy did. And they leave you with a huge medical bill ... and indelible damages and pain to those left behind, hopelessness of seeing the suffering your loved ones were subject to. Cancer didn't kill ...

If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with cancer and considering chemo treatment, I plead with you to please read this book: "Cancer is NOT a Disease" by Andreas Moritz to make an informed decision. Chemo treatments can wait, READ THIS BOOK !! Don't make nutritional healing a last resort, because after going through chemo treatments, your body no longer can respond to any nutritional approaches ... then it would be too late ... Your life is far too precious to be left in the hands of those who would never realize that chemo kills. SD.